Starquakes: Difference between revisions

From FRB Theory Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
|XrayCounterpart        = Yes
|XrayCounterpart        = Yes
|GammarayCounterpart    = Yes <br/> if jet aligned
|GammarayCounterpart    = Yes <br/> if jet aligned
|GWCounterpart          = --
|GWCounterpart          = Yes, but unlikely detectable
|NeutrinoCounterpart    = --
|NeutrinoCounterpart    = --
|References            = http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...852..140W
|References            = http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...852..140W, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.10394.pdf
|Comments              = None
|Comments              = None
}}
}}
Line 24: Line 24:
== Model Description ==
== Model Description ==


The starquakes of a pulsar have been considered as a source of repeating FRBs. The bursts of FRB 121102 are consistent with the aftershock sequence of an earthquake, where the burst’s time-decaying rate of seismicity falls within the typical values of earthquakes. They also show that the burst energy distribution of FRB 121102 has a power law form, much like that of the Gutenberg-Richter law of earthquakes. Further, the waiting time of bursts has a Gaussian distribution; another characteristic feature of earthquakes.  
The starquakes have been considered as a source of repeating FRBs. The aftershock sequence of an earthquake, where the burst’s time-decaying rate of seismicity falls within the typical values of earthquakes. The burst energy distribution of FRB 121102 has a power law form, much like that of the Gutenberg-Richter law of earthquakes. The waiting time of bursts has a Gaussian distribution; another characteristic feature of earthquakes. Young magnetars with strong and highly multipolar crustal magnetic fields can experience significant field rearrangements timescales of <~100 years. Magnetic stresses then occur throughout the outer layers of the star, potentially causing frequent crustal failures. The bursts of FRB 121102 and FRB 180814.J0422+73 are consistent with this picture.  


== Observational Constraints ==
== Observational Constraints ==


Starquakes are poorly understood, limiting the testability of this theory. They may be associated with SGRs, which offers counterparts for which to search.
Starquakes may be associated with SGRs or magentar flares, which offers counterparts for which to search.

Revision as of 08:07, 6 September 2019





Summary Table
Category Progenitor Type Energy Mechanism Emission Mechanism Counterparts References Brief Comments
LF Radio HF Radio Microwave Terahertz Optical/IR X-rays Gamma-rays Gravitational Waves Neutrinos
Other Starquakes Repeat Mag. reconnection Curv. Yes -- -- -- -- Yes Yes
if jet aligned
Yes, but unlikely detectable -- http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...852..140W, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.10394.pdf None

Definitions: LF Radio (3 MHz to 3 GHz); HF Radio (3 GHz to 30 GHz); Microwave (30 to 300 GHz)


Model Description

The starquakes have been considered as a source of repeating FRBs. The aftershock sequence of an earthquake, where the burst’s time-decaying rate of seismicity falls within the typical values of earthquakes. The burst energy distribution of FRB 121102 has a power law form, much like that of the Gutenberg-Richter law of earthquakes. The waiting time of bursts has a Gaussian distribution; another characteristic feature of earthquakes. Young magnetars with strong and highly multipolar crustal magnetic fields can experience significant field rearrangements timescales of <~100 years. Magnetic stresses then occur throughout the outer layers of the star, potentially causing frequent crustal failures. The bursts of FRB 121102 and FRB 180814.J0422+73 are consistent with this picture.

Observational Constraints

Starquakes may be associated with SGRs or magentar flares, which offers counterparts for which to search.